close

Filter

loading table of contents...

Deployment Manual / Version 2512.0

Table Of Contents
Parallel GC vs. G1GC

The two collectors make different trade-offs that operators should weigh against their deployment’s traffic profile and operational capabilities:

 Parallel GC (default)G1GC (opt-in)

OOM risk

Low — JDK bug does not apply

Elevated on JDK < 25 (see above)

GC pause duration

Long — seconds on large heaps

Short and bounded by MaxGCPauseMillis

Responsiveness under load

Degraded during Full GC

Consistently good

Raw GC throughput

Higher

Slightly lower due to concurrent GC threads

Large image transformation

Safe

Risk of heap fragmentation (see tuning note below)

CoreMedia support

Full (default configuration)

Customer responsibility; not actively supported

G1GC is worth considering for deployments that run with a well-provisioned heap, have active GC monitoring in place, and can react quickly to an OOM event should one occur. It is especially relevant for:

  • Content Application Engine (CAE) — live instances serving high-traffic sites

  • Headless Server — live instances under sustained load

Search Results

Table Of Contents
warning

Your Internet Explorer is no longer supported.

Please use Mozilla Firefox, Google Chrome, or Microsoft Edge.